Skip to main content

4-1 (welcome back, ben)

i have some mixed emotions about this, as i understand why people are a little hesitant to cheer for someone who seems to have tested the limits of the law when it comes to consent and control.  as has been said many times before, no charges were pressed against roethlisberger in the georgia case, but most accounts suggest that at the very least his behaviour was sketchy and immature, if not downright illegal and immoral.  so, i get the hesitation to cheer for him. 

on the other hand, everything that i was hoping would happen following these allegations has happened.  i was hoping ben would be suspended.  he was (four games).  i was hoping that this might help him get his life back on track (i can't know for certain if this true, but all accounts from him, his mentors, and the media indicate that he seems to be a changed human being), and this looks to have happened too.  he has recently satisfied the media's crushing curiosity with a slew of interviews in which he suggests that the allegations against him were false, but that he takes responsibility for putting himself in some pretty awful situations, and for falling away from his foundation and upbringing.  he has talked about getting right with God, and about reconnecting with his family in accountable ways.  will it last?  i have no idea.  but i am hopeful that this was the "rock bottom" that ben needed to get his off-the-field life on track.  because he is, first and foremost, a human being, not a football player. 

so, all of that being said, i was happy to have a reformed ben roethlisberger back at the helm for the steelers yesterday against the browns.  i'll save you the long game recap here, as you can find that on about 6,000 other steelers blogs on the interwebs.  suffice to say: it was good to have ben back.  the browns aren't as bad as they seem, and are dealing with a ton of injuries.  the steelers beat them pretty soundly, and now are in first place atop the division with the ravens losing to the cheatriots.  all is well. 

oh, one more thing, as for james harrison's supposed dirty hits, i would like someone to show me how those hits are illegal.  are they violent?  yes.  but illegal?  i just don't see it.  i've watched each one at least a dozen times and tried to imagine how he's supposed to make those tackles.  these guys get such mixed messages from us: we love the physicality and violence of the game and reward it with highlights and adulation, then, if someone gets hurt, we say they are a thug.  which is it?  we can't have it both ways.  i HATE seeing guys get hurt, as i think about their futures and their families, but i also enjoy the physicality of the game.  it is a fine line that the NFL seems to be having a more and more difficult time walking.  browns fans are upset, but until it changes to a flag-football league we can't complain.  it is the way the game is played.  james harrison did nothing illegal.  he didn't taunt.  he didn't showboat.  he made sure tackles against ball carriers who can easily make open field moves or escape arm tackles.  he should not be penalized, fined, chastised, told to scale it back, or labeled as a thug.  should the game change?  perhaps.  but harrison is only playing the game by the rules he's been given. 


poker affiliate said…
The Harrison hits were legal according to NFL rules, but he received a huge fine to give the appearance that the NFL is serious about protecting players. On the website they were selling pictures of the hits by Harrison, so it seems a little hypocritical.

Popular posts from this blog

bad haircuts (for a laugh)

everybody needs to laugh.  one good way i have found to make that happen is to do a simple google image search for 'bad haircut.'  when you do so, some of the following gems show up.  thankfully, my 9th grade school picture does NOT show up.  otherwise, it would certianly make this list!  please laugh freely and without inhibition.  thank you and have a nice day. 

State College to Birmingham

 as some of you know, i have been working towards a goal i set at the beginning of 2020 of running 1000 miles in one calendar year.  today is the last day of september (what?!?), and so that means the year is 3/4 of the way complete, which means i should be right around the 750 mile marker.  however, i am doing better than that, as my 5 mile run today put me at 847 miles for the year, almost 100 miles ahead of schedule!  i am feeling great, enjoying the journey, and experiencing a real sense of accomplishment as i work towards this goal.   i have also enjoyed these little milestones along the way, just to see how far i've come.  as it turns out, 847 miles from State College (along the roads, not as the crow flies) would have me arriving in Birmingham, AL, right about now!  not too shabby!  only about 150 to go!

i will give you a new name

in our church, we are continuing with a series called "letters from Jesus," in which we are looking at the seven letters in the beginning of revelation addressed to seven churches in asia.  we are imagining what it would be like if we were to receive a hand-written letter from Jesus to our church.  what would it say?  how would we be encouraged?  how would we be challenged?  we've looked at three of the letters now.  this week we looked at the letter to the church in pergamum.  the letter to them includes some harsh criticism of some of their behavior, but it also says that Christ understands how difficult their situation is.  and in case they feel like they are stuck in their sinfulness, Jesus says something amazing to them:  i will give you a new name.  the world gives us so many names, doesn't it?  our parents, of course, give us our birth names.  but the naming doesn't stop there.  it continues right on through elementary school, high school, and into t